Best website for dirty chatting with girls - Consolidating contracting tennessee


consolidating contracting tennessee-62consolidating contracting tennessee-10consolidating contracting tennessee-8

For purposes of subparagraph (A), savings in administrative or personnel costs alone do not constitute a sufficient justification for a consolidation of contract requirements in a procurement unless the expected total amount of the cost savings, as determined by the senior procurement executive or Chief Acquisition Officer, is expected to be substantial in relation to the total cost of the procurement. 114–92, § 863(c), substituted “The head” for “Subject to paragraph (4), the head” in introductory provisions.

Not later than 7 days after making a determination that an acquisition strategy involving a consolidation of contract requirements is necessary and justified under subparagraph (A), the senior procurement executive or Chief Acquisition Officer shall publish a notice on a public website that such determination has been made.

(A) and (B) for “or a multiple award contract to satisfy 2 or more requirements of the Federal agency for goods or services that have been provided to or performed for the Federal agency under 2 or more separate contracts lower in cost than the total cost of the contract for which the offers are solicited; and”.

112–239, § 1671(a), substituted “or a multiple award contract—” and subpars.

Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “(A) .—The date described in this subparagraph is the date on which the Administrator determines the Department of Defense or a military department is in compliance with the Government-wide contracting goals under section 644 of this title.” This is a list of parts within the Code of Federal Regulations for which this US Code section provides rulemaking authority.